Reflections Aboard Flight MH051
I am not sure what is the background to this picture. Neither do I know who was the photographer / media organization to give credit to.

But it's powerful enough to capture my unusually short attention span for Internet forums.
I happen to be in Osaka during Japan's 62nd anniversary of Hiroshima Bombing. Japanese news channels were airing re-runs of Prime Minister's Shinzo Abe's speech in some idyllic surrounding reiterating its stance against nuclear proliferation.
The irony is that months before the Hiroshima memorial, Abe's administration has been pushing for a "reinterpretation" of the Pacifist Constitution - a set of documents drawn up by the victors of World War 2, particulary the USA to ensure that Japan does not go into war again. The constitution laid grounds for a democratic government and it limits Japan's military activities. Technically, Japan is not allowed to have an army. The constitution only allows for a "Self-defence force" whose international role thus far has been confined to peace-keeping and providing engineering and logistical support to the US military forces. The Pacifist Constitution was drafted in English and subsequently translated into Japanese. The early generation of post-war Japanese government bureaucrats had intentionally translated the documents such that certain key areas were "lost in translation," thus allowing some room for future "reinterpretation."
Japan is land of great oppossites and hypocrisy. This is a land where salarymen in their Toyota Corollas jostle for space with monstrous thousand horsepowers Nissan Skylines. Its supposedly devout Shinto-Buddhist society calls for piety and moral restrain but it is also one of the largest exporter of pornography in all nature. I am not kidding you but in big Japanese cities it is not uncommon to have school girls in their itsy bitsy short "sailor-moon" skirts after their school doing some Konichiwa-ing to salarymen offering companionship in exchange for some money. It is not always that the companionship is sexual in nature.
In a land that is increasingly losing its soul and identity against the changing tides of globalisation, Abe's move to drum up Japanese nationalistic pride is welcomed by many. Of course, that is if we put aside his recent corruption charges and his more recent defeat to control the Lower House. But for the short period of his political fame, Abe's recent play of nationalistic emotions among the Japanese public gave the world a strong reminder on the new generation of Japanese youths who have no inkling of Japan's brutal history and its massare at Nanking; War crimes that Japan consistently deny and refuses to apologise till today.
Its youth are not any wiser no thanks to a systematic removal of all references to Imperial Japan's role in World War 2 in their school history textbooks and a lack of exposure to Western intellectual writtings due to the language barrier. As they say, history is written in the eyes of the victor, or in this case, the writer. Then again, our Malaysian government is equally guilty of rewritting history as well. Do you seriously believe what you read about May 13 1969 and separation of Singapore from Malaysia in your Sejarah textbook?
As I write, our world is raging a different sort of war, not the usual ones motivated by nationalism or political ideology as in the previous decades, but one of political-theology - of Islam and the rest of the world, or is it the rest of the world against Islam. At the end of the day does it matter? The Church, in all its humanly imperfection and foolishness has waged over 200 years of crusades against erm...the mosque? One millenia later, we have still yet to move beyond our theological adolescence. Funny how we Christians happily use "The Church" as a sort of derogatory reference against institutionalised religion but the same can't be said about Muslims. I wonder if the religious historical phase of separation between Church and State and the inter-relation between Islam and nation politics has anything to do with it.
In every phase of history, whenever somebody rises up from the masses of delusioned mediocre minds with a high sense of injustice around them, it always end up in tragedy of catastrophic scale. Adolf Hitler and his Third Reich, Mao Zedong and his commies, Pol Pot, Taleban and their brand of corrupt-morals-is-the-source-of-world's-problem-Islam-is-the-solution nonsense, the strings of African leaders who come and go - all of them promised an utopia where justice will be preserved, the weak and poor will be defended. And it always, always end in more bloodsheed and another series of coups.
Morality aside, can world peace be practically attained? Or should I rephrased it - can the world AFFORD world peace? I have mentioned this before in my previous more brash blog, that global military defence spending contributes a significant amount of capital to the world's financial markets. These billion dollar military contracts provide millions of jobs in along the entire supply chain of the weapons industry. Boeing's main source of income is the US Air Force, same goes to its European equivalent Airbus under the umbrella of European Aeronautic Defence and Space Company. Ericsson sold its handset manufacturing business to Sony to concentrate on the more profitable back-end equipments, which indirectly implies military customers. Heck the Internet you are using now is an offspring of a US Defence Agency project - DARPANET. I am not sure if the global economy can compensate for the crunch should the entire defence industry collapses and grinds to a halt. I suppose most people should have a certain level of intellect to expect the direct relation between military spending and global conflict. Read this for a better understanding of defence industry as a tool of political leverage.
I guess there is just something dirty in our human blood that we simply cannot attain a clean and just society. I leave with this piece of writting by by Haris Ibrahim. I have to admit that my preconceived notions against Muslims caused a great surprise to myself that this came from a Muslim, a fellow Malaysian.

But it's powerful enough to capture my unusually short attention span for Internet forums.
I happen to be in Osaka during Japan's 62nd anniversary of Hiroshima Bombing. Japanese news channels were airing re-runs of Prime Minister's Shinzo Abe's speech in some idyllic surrounding reiterating its stance against nuclear proliferation.
The irony is that months before the Hiroshima memorial, Abe's administration has been pushing for a "reinterpretation" of the Pacifist Constitution - a set of documents drawn up by the victors of World War 2, particulary the USA to ensure that Japan does not go into war again. The constitution laid grounds for a democratic government and it limits Japan's military activities. Technically, Japan is not allowed to have an army. The constitution only allows for a "Self-defence force" whose international role thus far has been confined to peace-keeping and providing engineering and logistical support to the US military forces. The Pacifist Constitution was drafted in English and subsequently translated into Japanese. The early generation of post-war Japanese government bureaucrats had intentionally translated the documents such that certain key areas were "lost in translation," thus allowing some room for future "reinterpretation."
Japan is land of great oppossites and hypocrisy. This is a land where salarymen in their Toyota Corollas jostle for space with monstrous thousand horsepowers Nissan Skylines. Its supposedly devout Shinto-Buddhist society calls for piety and moral restrain but it is also one of the largest exporter of pornography in all nature. I am not kidding you but in big Japanese cities it is not uncommon to have school girls in their itsy bitsy short "sailor-moon" skirts after their school doing some Konichiwa-ing to salarymen offering companionship in exchange for some money. It is not always that the companionship is sexual in nature.
In a land that is increasingly losing its soul and identity against the changing tides of globalisation, Abe's move to drum up Japanese nationalistic pride is welcomed by many. Of course, that is if we put aside his recent corruption charges and his more recent defeat to control the Lower House. But for the short period of his political fame, Abe's recent play of nationalistic emotions among the Japanese public gave the world a strong reminder on the new generation of Japanese youths who have no inkling of Japan's brutal history and its massare at Nanking; War crimes that Japan consistently deny and refuses to apologise till today.
Its youth are not any wiser no thanks to a systematic removal of all references to Imperial Japan's role in World War 2 in their school history textbooks and a lack of exposure to Western intellectual writtings due to the language barrier. As they say, history is written in the eyes of the victor, or in this case, the writer. Then again, our Malaysian government is equally guilty of rewritting history as well. Do you seriously believe what you read about May 13 1969 and separation of Singapore from Malaysia in your Sejarah textbook?
As I write, our world is raging a different sort of war, not the usual ones motivated by nationalism or political ideology as in the previous decades, but one of political-theology - of Islam and the rest of the world, or is it the rest of the world against Islam. At the end of the day does it matter? The Church, in all its humanly imperfection and foolishness has waged over 200 years of crusades against erm...the mosque? One millenia later, we have still yet to move beyond our theological adolescence. Funny how we Christians happily use "The Church" as a sort of derogatory reference against institutionalised religion but the same can't be said about Muslims. I wonder if the religious historical phase of separation between Church and State and the inter-relation between Islam and nation politics has anything to do with it.
In every phase of history, whenever somebody rises up from the masses of delusioned mediocre minds with a high sense of injustice around them, it always end up in tragedy of catastrophic scale. Adolf Hitler and his Third Reich, Mao Zedong and his commies, Pol Pot, Taleban and their brand of corrupt-morals-is-the-source-of-world's-problem-Islam-is-the-solution nonsense, the strings of African leaders who come and go - all of them promised an utopia where justice will be preserved, the weak and poor will be defended. And it always, always end in more bloodsheed and another series of coups.
Morality aside, can world peace be practically attained? Or should I rephrased it - can the world AFFORD world peace? I have mentioned this before in my previous more brash blog, that global military defence spending contributes a significant amount of capital to the world's financial markets. These billion dollar military contracts provide millions of jobs in along the entire supply chain of the weapons industry. Boeing's main source of income is the US Air Force, same goes to its European equivalent Airbus under the umbrella of European Aeronautic Defence and Space Company. Ericsson sold its handset manufacturing business to Sony to concentrate on the more profitable back-end equipments, which indirectly implies military customers. Heck the Internet you are using now is an offspring of a US Defence Agency project - DARPANET. I am not sure if the global economy can compensate for the crunch should the entire defence industry collapses and grinds to a halt. I suppose most people should have a certain level of intellect to expect the direct relation between military spending and global conflict. Read this for a better understanding of defence industry as a tool of political leverage.
I guess there is just something dirty in our human blood that we simply cannot attain a clean and just society. I leave with this piece of writting by by Haris Ibrahim. I have to admit that my preconceived notions against Muslims caused a great surprise to myself that this came from a Muslim, a fellow Malaysian.
Posted by whylikethat at 11:48 PM | 2 comments




My country is like an airplane that has been hijacked by a terrorist organization. They have ousted our captain and founding father Tunku Abdul Rahman, who fought for this country’s independence to be a secular state where everyone has their right to believe in their own faith and to pursue their own dreams, as enshrined in the Constitution. Yes that big C word. CONSTITUTION! Do you know what that means? Shame on you calling yourself a Malaysian if you don't. Aren't we suppose to have a sense of respect and reverence to it. It's more than just a word. It's THE document that protects your freedom, my freedom, our children's freedom damn it! In the captain’s seat now is a generation of ultra-Malays who wants to take this plane to somewhere far beyond the intention of our founding fathers. These people are banking on the public's ignorance, short term memory and a general lack of public will, particularly among minority races to defend our Constitution, to allow them to rewrite history. Our education system and history has been held hostage, selectively edited and certain personalities criminalised like Chin Peng while the contribution of others vastly diluted, like Dr. Burhanuddin al-Helmy, while certain uneducated amateur terrorists overly-glorified. May 13 1969 is constantly being used to as a tool to threaten the Chinese than as a reminder of the tragedy of disunity. Never mind the fact historians are hard-pressed to find any credible documents to backup the "official" version of the May 13 story. Myths of this land called Tanah Melayu were propagated to justify the special rights of a newly defined race called Bumiputera, nevermind the fact that in practise its definition has more to do with Islam than ancestral roots.