First World and Third World Parliament
The difference between a Third World parliament and a First World parliament.
The infamous "Malaysia ini negara Islam, you tidak suka, you keluar dari Malaysia!" ("Malaysia is an Islamic state, You don't like it, you get out of Malaysia!") statement by a BN MP. Funny how BN always demonise PAS as a party ran by stupid old men who are hell-bent on Taliban-ising Malaysia.
The infamous "Bocor."
Now constrast the previous scenes those below.
Nominated MP Prof. Thio Li-Ann of the Law Faculty of the National University of Singapore presenting her arguments on the controversial legalising of homosexuality in Singapore.
Smear tactics indicate the poor quality of debate and also of character. Let us have rational debate, not dire straits and deception, free from abusive rhetoric and childish tantrums. As Singapore approaches her Jubilee, my hope for the post-65 generation is that we will not become an uncivil civil society born from an immature culture of vulgarity which celebrates the base, not the noble. Well said. And what a far cry from the usual shallow rhetorics that we are used to hearing from the clowns masquerading as Members of the Parliament in our Parliament.
Both parliaments are far from perfect. Both suffer from the same issue of being overly dominated by a single party, BN for Malaysia and PAP for Singapore. Both are frequently criticised by Western circles as being stifling the development of democratic processes in their respective countries. But there is one stark difference - one chooses the best brains to represent them while the other has idiots with dubious academic qualifications.
Below is a scene from the Australian parliament. There were controversial issues being tabled out but still...nobody made a fool of themselves.
Malaysians, please do your country a favour, please vote to keep idiots out of our parliament. For goodness sake has people no respect for the strongest symbol of our nation's democracy, passed down to us from our founding fore-fathers? Has it all gone to the dogs and its worth reduced to mere cheap stand-up comedies, funded by tax-payer's money?
If that's not bad enough, watch this recording of how an opposition party politician was barred from entering the parliament compounds and arrested under the disguise of "safe-guarding national security."
How an unarmed man, wishing to enter the parliament to hand over a memorandum can be considered a threat to national security baffles me. Since when did UMNO owns the parliament? Our PM says that lawyers and opposition party members are not above the law, and that the parliament is not a shelter for criminals. So then is UMNO above the law? That they can arrest anyone as they wish without any regard to the necessary protocols, in accordance to basic human rights?
DAP has stated their stand that they will never cooperate with PAS until PAS drops their Islamic state agenda. Despite their differences in partisan politics, it is heartening to see two DAP members standing up for a PAS politician. Let's not be overly cynical about this for a moment and just put all the above into perspective.
Where do you stand in the midst of all these happenings? What is your role, as a Malaysian, as a Muslim, a Christian, a Buddhist, a marginalized Hindu, etc etc? What does your faith requires you to do? To be a voice for the marginalized, for all that is wrong and unjust? Or do you choose to stay on the sidelines, which by itself is already a decision. That you simply couldn't care less about anything other than yourself, and maybe your after-life rewards if you are one of those dudes who keep talking on this life after this earth.
The infamous "Malaysia ini negara Islam, you tidak suka, you keluar dari Malaysia!" ("Malaysia is an Islamic state, You don't like it, you get out of Malaysia!") statement by a BN MP. Funny how BN always demonise PAS as a party ran by stupid old men who are hell-bent on Taliban-ising Malaysia.
The infamous "Bocor."
Now constrast the previous scenes those below.
Nominated MP Prof. Thio Li-Ann of the Law Faculty of the National University of Singapore presenting her arguments on the controversial legalising of homosexuality in Singapore.
Smear tactics indicate the poor quality of debate and also of character. Let us have rational debate, not dire straits and deception, free from abusive rhetoric and childish tantrums. As Singapore approaches her Jubilee, my hope for the post-65 generation is that we will not become an uncivil civil society born from an immature culture of vulgarity which celebrates the base, not the noble. Well said. And what a far cry from the usual shallow rhetorics that we are used to hearing from the clowns masquerading as Members of the Parliament in our Parliament.
Both parliaments are far from perfect. Both suffer from the same issue of being overly dominated by a single party, BN for Malaysia and PAP for Singapore. Both are frequently criticised by Western circles as being stifling the development of democratic processes in their respective countries. But there is one stark difference - one chooses the best brains to represent them while the other has idiots with dubious academic qualifications.
Below is a scene from the Australian parliament. There were controversial issues being tabled out but still...nobody made a fool of themselves.
Malaysians, please do your country a favour, please vote to keep idiots out of our parliament. For goodness sake has people no respect for the strongest symbol of our nation's democracy, passed down to us from our founding fore-fathers? Has it all gone to the dogs and its worth reduced to mere cheap stand-up comedies, funded by tax-payer's money?
If that's not bad enough, watch this recording of how an opposition party politician was barred from entering the parliament compounds and arrested under the disguise of "safe-guarding national security."
How an unarmed man, wishing to enter the parliament to hand over a memorandum can be considered a threat to national security baffles me. Since when did UMNO owns the parliament? Our PM says that lawyers and opposition party members are not above the law, and that the parliament is not a shelter for criminals. So then is UMNO above the law? That they can arrest anyone as they wish without any regard to the necessary protocols, in accordance to basic human rights?
DAP has stated their stand that they will never cooperate with PAS until PAS drops their Islamic state agenda. Despite their differences in partisan politics, it is heartening to see two DAP members standing up for a PAS politician. Let's not be overly cynical about this for a moment and just put all the above into perspective.
Where do you stand in the midst of all these happenings? What is your role, as a Malaysian, as a Muslim, a Christian, a Buddhist, a marginalized Hindu, etc etc? What does your faith requires you to do? To be a voice for the marginalized, for all that is wrong and unjust? Or do you choose to stay on the sidelines, which by itself is already a decision. That you simply couldn't care less about anything other than yourself, and maybe your after-life rewards if you are one of those dudes who keep talking on this life after this earth.
Posted by whylikethat at 01:01 AM | 2 comments





